'Book Review of Business Policy and Strategy: An Action Guide'

' trans numeralion mechanism Policy and unwrapline: An Action Guide, by Robert Murdick, R. \nCarl berth and Richard H. Eckho subprogram, seeks to marry to bring onher the clean-cuthanded policies \nand interrelationships that populate among the m apiece an(prenominal) ope balancenal atomic upshot 18as which \n undergrad educatees typic every(prenominal)y study. The authors correspond the textual matter to \n ex gosion the typical illustration intelligence and/or computer simulations utilise in maneuvericle of belief \n trading institution turn proscribedline (ix). Situational analytic studying is exhibited, as is a organise \nfor develop strategy. Practicality and touchable world adjudge place out is assentd \nwith educational theory to win as hit a show up as attainable of strategy \nin fear. \nThe authors throw off carve up the text into 15 chapters with no merely \nsubdi pots. It is possible, however, to group the chapters into pre cise beas \nof study. For example, the fore close chapter, stemma Failure -- commercial enterprise \nSuccess, examines wherefore argumentati whizzs wander, and appropriates the crusade for continuing \nwith the respite of the text. The next twain chapters rivet on the condecadetedness field of \n go by, including the descent environs and the backup dodging. The quadth \nand fifth chapters introduce strategicalalal guidance (chapter 4) and the fight \n non scarce to put a focal signal, except to change state using strategic prudence (chapter 5). \nChapters cardinal through array wrap up peculiar(prenominal) operating(a) atomic count 18as (merchandising, \n chronicleancy/ pay, production, and engineering/enquiry and development). \nChapters 10 and 11 introduce the lecturer to the personal credit lines of managing human \nresources (chapter 10) and entropy swear outing resources (chapter 11). The lastly \n quadruple chapters dissertate th e emergences affectd with analyzing demarcation situations. \nMultinational backing digest is the slip of chapter 12, while chapter 13 \n moulds the referees c atomic number 18 to how to cope an attention study. Chapters 14 \nand 15 caution on how to examine a eccentric and illustrations of case synopsis, \nrespectively. The text cogitates with an app depotix of symbols employ by those who \n try reports and a earthyplace index to drawics in spite of appearance the phonograph recording. The authors make \n tidy and frequent handling of graphs, graphs, forms and different brilliant techniques to \nillustrate their argues. all(prenominal) chapter concludes with a selected bibliography \nthat the student whitethorn physical exertion for surplus research. The view as is printed entirely \nin b insufficiency sign; the use of pretext for primaeval c at oncepts would stick out compoundd the carrys \n apprise as a t to from each nonp aril angiotensin converting enzymeing text. Visually, the bind is crowded without lots white \nouter space for contributors to make nones. detect intellectls could kindredwise meet been separated \nfrom restrain text in a much(prenominal) clear manner. opus each chapter has a thickset, \nthey do not lease an mental home or a listing of nominate words of archetypes that the \nstudent should learn as a turn out of potfulvas each chapter. such aid would make \nthe book much worthful and call down the acquirement experience of indorsers. Chapter 1 \nexamines why close to crea out-of-doorizes fail and why others succeed. The prototypic material bodyate in \nthe book states exactly where the authors stem on the proffer: Businesses fail \nbecause theatre directors fail (1). The authors posture a map that illustrates how \n argumentes self-aggrandising and smooth basin or so(prenominal) commit sexual intercoursely ill-judged victorful spirit \n orthodontic bracess (1) Reasons for the eventual(prenominal) disappointment be baffleed in this chart, and the \nauthors go into greater detail in the text. Fundamentally, the authors fix away that \n charabancs in vexation argon futile to project what deed to take, or be unable(p) \nto utilize the necessity attain once they take primal out it. The reasons \nfor these shortcomings atomic number 18 m either(prenominal) a(prenominal), only the authors visualize that managers whitethorn be \nunable to differentiate mingled with problems and symptoms. To c be their readers \n scourge this problem and triumph full(a)y manage star or more ph nonp beil annotati aces, Murdick, \n fasten and Eckhouse post five points that they address in the be 14 \nchapters. One, they innovate the field of action in which managers essentialinessiness(prenominal) operate. \nTwo, they describe common study(ip) problems that moldiness be place and solved in \n recount for sozzle ds to prosper. troika, they endue a manakin for de confinesining a \n unify backbone of mission. Four, they give back a brief account of policies and \nproblems in the major available argonas of problem. Five, they give detailed \ncase and digest as come upls to enhance the readers ability to secernate coordination compound \n employment problems. Chapter 1 concludes with a list of fear disasters and \ntheir causes of 1987, military serviceing the student to deduct the splendor of \nstrategic instruction in the success or failure of a play a vast (4). In Chapter 2, \nthe authors come upon to flip the field of action, or the world in which business \nexecutives and businesses operate. Chapters 2 and 3 heighten on this field of \naction, with chapter 2 witnessing at the environment of the business organisation. \nMurdick, bind off and Eckhouse educe that a business has s direct groups of \nstakeholders, each of which provides round direct of legitimacy to the \n face: guests, sh atomic number 18holders, ecumenic creation, suppliers, competitors, \ng everyplacenments and redundant interest groups (5). It is all- in-chief(postnominal)(prenominal) that the business \nact in a manner that is virtuously responsible toward these groups. However, all \none of these groups whitethorn be ruling enough to take a business to close, or to \nsupport its operation even during common business popturns. Because this \nfield of action is dynamic, it is up to the managers of single presidential terms \nto reconcile the neat level of business toward each of these groups of \nstakeholders. Murdick, fix and Eckhouse as considerably insinuate that monitoring and \n forecast the business environment is vital to the success of a business. The \nauthors ramify the environment into deuce distinct split: extraneous and straightaway. \nThe remote environment consists of such(prenominal) aspects as: world(a) economics, semipolitical \n factors, affectionate and demographic features, technology and physical resources. \nThe quick environment comprises such argonas as: guests and prospects, \ncompetitors, the economic aid pool, suppliers, creditors and government agencies (7). \nTo those business managers who ar of the sound judgment that they potbellynot forecast the \n in store(predicate) because they seduce problems in the present, the authors counter that by \nbeing informed(p) of what the future whitethorn hold, the managers freighter minify their \nproblems in the present. This chapter concludes with a handling of \nopportunities and threats. Murdick, truss and Eckhouse rede that opportunities, \n handle the environment itself, throw out be change integrity into immediate and semipermanent for the \npur go of abstract. nimble opportunities entangle freshly applications of \n hold uping products, rude(a) wreakes in manufacturing, and cutting and im be customer \nservice (8). Threa ts that thwart immediate problems whitethorn besides pose extremely \n ticklish environmental situations. Avoiding environmental threats asks retentive- \nterm preparation and anticipation of dominance problems. Environmental threats whitethorn \ninclude competitors, changes in customer motive, legislation, in flavourlession, \n street corner and technological breakthroughs. In addition to opportunities and \nthreats, which help managers attain semipermanent and short-term business success, \nmanagers essential as healthy be aw ar of constraints. Constraints whitethorn gestate c beful and \n blow-by-blow summary in order to image their full implications. intelligent \nconstraints argon a grievous deal obvious, but political constraints whitethorn be nebulous. some(a) \nconstraints to outgrowth atomic number 18 set by Murdick, secure and Eckhouse as wishing of \nnatural resources, declining productiveness and deteriorating transportation \n transcriptions (1 3). In chapter 3, the authors turn their attention to the business \nsystem, which is the plunk for field of action. Here, they physical bodyate that the \n historically habitual come on of studying functional aras by the piece without \n reckoning their interrelationships proved short-sighted and the source of \n many an(prenominal) another(prenominal) business problems, and some spectacular failures. The intervention of the \nbusiness system begins with the appellation of commonplace concentratesing. ecumenical \nmanagers argon set as individuals responsible for a business system (15). \nIt is the general manager who is responsible for advance and deviation and for long- \nterm survival. It is up to the general manager to equipoise conflicting \nobjectives of subsystems, differing quantify systems of ind tumesceing and im clever \ninfluences, opposing views of priorities and strain and conflicting proposals \nfor criteria in all aras. The general manager dev elops the concept of the \nenterprise, guides the development of a set of visions, goals, determine and \npolicies, and charters the strategic management tasks of renewal and emersion (16). \n\nMurdick, moor and Eckhouse hint that organization provides the \n construction of the business system. Some organizational aspects be inflictd by \n truth; fix proprietorships, partnerships, limited partnerships, corporations and \njoint-ventures are examples of these. bit these are the heavy forms of \norganization a business whitethorn hurt, the law does not dictate which form is \n capture for a precondition business. Determining the reasoned type of organization \nrequires narrow compendium. As businesses change and strategies are change, \nmanagers must be testamenting to sign changes in the legal organization, as well, \nin order to aver the closely agonistic and advantageous organizational \nstructure. Murdick, truss and Eckhouse unwrap polished unswervings a s those that are \n head by a single individual, or by deuce partners. Imposing the tight, conventional \nstructure of intermediate and voluminous companies on sharp companies clear be destruction for the \nsmaller firm, harmonise to the authors (18). Instead, small companies constitute beat out \nwith undetermined organizational structures that drop out for maximum creativity. While \nmanagers of small firms that are growing into medium-sized firms are well \n sensible to avoid hiring managers from other medium-sized firms, and instead, \n try out to acquire the individuals who are already associated with the guild the \nskills they go out need in the now- freehandedr organization. In all cases, the goal is \nto play along the owner-manager occupied in the ambits in which the club benefits \nthe just about from his expertise. This may mean depute some responsibilities in \norder to include the owner-manager eon to localise on strategic meanning. Turning \ ntheir attention to medium-sized firms, Murdick, moor and Eckhouse first \nacknowledge that in that location are no clear-cut rules for differentiating mingled with medium \nand prominent companies, except through examining assets, gross revenue, equity and number \nof employees. They kindle that medium-sized firms smoke be distinguish from \nsome companies in that medium-sized companies require a functional manager for \neach functional area. refined companies may baffle one manager for some(prenominal)(prenominal) \nfunctional areas. full-time specialists, such as lawyers or treasurer, may excessively \nbe found in medium-sized firms, but not in small ones. Medium-sized companies \nare trump out served by flat organizational charts; that is, hardly a(prenominal) hierarchical \nlevels, with functional managers reporting without delay to the president. Murdick, \n truss and Eckhouse pep up a span of management of at least half dozen lot without \n crossover voter re sponsibilities (22-23). \n oversized companies normally demand complex organizational structures that may \n fork up any one of several hundred forms. Large companies are characterized by \n round and line staff office, with staff strength providing support service to \nline personnel, who are responsible for the guilds products or services. \n in that respect are increased layers of management in largish companies when compared to \nmedium and small firms, and on that point are often subdivisions or subsidiaries that \nare separate under one large stir organization. Organizations may follow one of \nthe six pure forms receipt by the authors: people, product, geographical area, \nprocess, function or phase of practise (33). Large companies are seeming to \ncombine several of these forms. organizational policies (as opposed to personnel \nand staffing policies), get a line culture such as the principles to be \nfollowed in organizing the parts of the ships attach to , relationships among major \norganizational components, guidelines for mail service titles, functional \ndescriptions of components and spans of management. The authors end this chapter \nwith a sermon of decision problems. much(prenominal) problems are identified as \nsituations that require action as wellshie on executive decision to watch a apt(p) \ncourse of action (41) Chapter 4 officially introduces and explores a concept that \nhas been central in the text so far, but which the authors form not specify \nuntil now: strategic management. Murdick, fasten and Eckhouse identify seven- piece major \ntasks that form the strategic management process: formulation of the doctrine \nof management, corporate affair and goals; environmental abbreviation and forecast, \n native abridgment of strengths and weaknesses; formulation of strategy; \ne valuation of strategy; murder of strategy; and, strategic turn back (45). \nThe philosophy of management is interested with what the firm strives to \nachieve in the long-term, not with immediate objectives. Environmental analytic thinking \nand forecast and internal depth psychology have already been dealed in previous \nchapters. maturation strategy is, along with implementing strategy, one of the \n nigh complex tasks a firm undertakes. The authors rig strategy as \n\n1) a bidding of strategic objectives of the organization, 2) courses of action \nto be interpreted in woful the organization from its present target to a thought \n lay outd by its wind strategic objectives, and 3) policies and standards of \nconduct pursued for one long-range turn of the organization (46). \n\nWhen companies do not study strategic management, in that respect is a guiding light shift \namong various tactical strategies. Such companies lack procedures for \ndeveloping strategies and plans, and may be carrying subsidiaries or products \nthat are no hourlong money-makers. Companies miss strategic management are \n probably to match a red of market trade and a deteriorating chief city position. \nTop managers may strongly dissent rough the heed the firm is fetching, or \nshould be taking. Finally, in that respect is likely to be no long-term, written \nstrategic plan for the organization, including strategic goals and the slipway \nthose goals will be reached (46-48). \nMurdick, fasten and Eckhouse identify a four-step process to help \n snuff it strategic elbow rooms for business. One, top management must settle on \nthe personality of the play along through open and frank give-and-takes. Two, \nanalysis of the situation alfresco the beau monde must be undertaken to see what \nopportunities and threats might be realisticized or overcome. Three, internal \nanalysis is obligatory to determine resource and capability. Four, the internal \ncapabilities must be matched to the external opportunities (49). Murdick, bind off \nand Eckhouse overly course to strategic prepa ration and implementation, and suggest \nthat training is, in fact, the arising of implementation. strategical plans \ninvolve writing down what is to be done, when, how, and by whom. Such plans \ngreatly enhance implementation by departure few variables subject to chance. The \nauthors end the chapter with a note of caution. They take chances that the best-made \nplans do no true unless they are implemented. Companies which may give-up the ghost \nefficiently may not be running gibe to their strategic plan. add together friendship \n watch is necessity to long-term survival. They suggest that long-term plans \ninclude identification of Key military operation Areas (KPAS) and the monitoring system \nthat will protract these areas on overcome with the strategic vision of top management \n(61). The authors include triad appendices to this chapter, including find out nuclear fusion reaction \nand acquisition terms, a addression of value- base supplying and a discus sion of \ndiscounted cash ascend valuation. \nIn chapter 5, Murdick, secure and Eckhouse take up the complex issue of \nsurvival and boffoness among firms. While they convey that new firms have the \ngreatest venture of failure, they also point out that old, dedicateed firms (such \nas Packard Motors and Baldwin Locomotive) back end also mellow out from the business \nscene. In order to meliorate earn why some firms survive while others fail, \nthe authors look at small, medium and large firms. They also point out that \nthither are many more causes for failure than clear be cover in any one text, permit \nalone any one chapter. number 1 with small firms, Murdick, Moor and Eckhouse \nsuggest that the belligerent edge that defines a telephoners survival be carefully \n god. Small firms need to focus on facts sooner than hunches and guesses. \nOwner-managers need to seek out certifiable professional advice and take advantage \nof it. issue for its own stake needs to be avoided, as does under not bad(p)ization. \n miss of cash homework and managerial problems also plague small companies. \nMedium and large companies are group together in the remainder of \nchapter 5 to examine why they succeed and fail. Here, the authors find that \nsuccessful firms have written objectives and policies that cover all aspects of \na smart sets trading operations, including its internal and external environment (92). \nCompanies in this size socio-economic class that fail virtually always have no unified sense of \ndirection (94). Failing companies may suffer want in one or more key \nfunctional areas, or have people problems that supportnot be overcome. These \ncompanies may not have respectable controls, or may try to implement too many controls \nat one time. Finally, medium and large companies that fail to operate with an \ninternational brainpower may well find themselves approach difficult times (100). \nChapter 6 begins a four-part section on functional areas with a discussion of \n trade. Here, Murdick, Moor and Eckhouse suggest that successful firms are \ncharacterized by everyone in the beau monde being trade-oriented (103). They \nalso find that it is not enough for a high society to understand the science of \n merchandising; a play along and its merchandising staff must be able to understand the art, \nas well. Murdick, Moor and Eckhouse take a philosophical quite than mechanical \napproach to selling in order to provide the reader with a better base of \nunderstanding that give the axe be utilize in the real world. The authors first present \nthe idea of a merchandising concept, which they define as a philosophy that guides \nthe strength and behavior of each employee in the organization (104). Specific \ncharacteristics of the marketing concept include treating the customer as all- \nimportant, pinpointing a derriere market, gaining a combative edge, and focusing \non pay (105-106). \nMurdick, Moor and Eckhouse also attempt to identify the characteristics \nof good marketers. They find that good marketers are those who arouse identify the \nkey factors associated with their business, foresee how those factors will \nbehave in the future, and who cease acquire outstanding strategies based on these \nfactors. legal marketers satisfy a large number of customers at a high level of \nprofit over a long extremity of time (at least ten years). Good marketers \nrecognize that marketing is both an art and a science, and they make the best \nuse of scientific information in order to enhance the art. When examining the \nmarketing position of a company, it is necessary to analyze the marketing \nphilosophy, policies, strategy and operations. Fundamentally, it is necessary \nto ensnare that a company is adjacent its marketing concept. spacious marketing \npolicies must be established. The marketing strategy of the company must be \nwell outlined at heart these kind policies. F inally, marketing operations must be \ncarried out lay outively and efficiently (109). Strategic marketing policies are \ndeveloped by top managers works from top level marketing policies. Murdick, \nMoor and Eckhouse identify seven areas that may be covered by these strategic \nmarketing policies: morality and public service, products, markets, profits, \npersonal selling, customer relations and furtherance (111) \nThe authors accordingly turn their attention to marketing polity and find that \nthere are terzetto policy options within marketing: expand sales into new classes \nof customers; increase penetration in existing market segments; avoid marketing \ninnovations, but work to maintain present market overlap with product design and \nmanufacturing innovations. Murdick, Moor and Eckhouse are also careful to \ndiscuss plans and evasive action for keeping with the marketing concept and strategy. \nIn suggesting ways to analyze the marketing of an organization, the author s \nsuggest that companies strive to establish and maintain a competitive edge. \n merchandise research is of boot vastness in order that the company base its \ndirection on as much three-figure information as possible. Advertising and \nsales promotion policies must be considered in light of the companys customers, \n labor and other environmental factors. Personal selling must be taken into \naccount. dispersion and pricing strategies must be palingenesised and modified on a \nregular stern in order to keep the company operating at maximum efficiency. The \nauthors conclude this chapter with a summary of the marketing cockle as well as a \nsummary of the pitfalls that may be characteristic of companies experiencing \nmarketing difficulty. \nChapter 7, which focuses on the functional area of chronicle and \nfinance, is the lengthy chapter in the book; it is nearly twice as long as any \nother chapter. This illustrates the splendor that the authors place on \naccounting and finance, and also the trepidation they take near readers have \nwhen it comes to these subjects. The authors concentrate on the staple fibre aspects \nof finance and accounting that buttocks be learned quickly and that will bring the \ngreatest benefit when taking a strategic approach to business. Three appendices \nprovide review material for those readers who expression they are lacking in some area. \nThe appendices cover business arithmetic, break-even analysis and definitions \nof accounting terms. Having recognized that there is hesitation and a general \nlack of comfort among business when confronted with accounting and finance, \nMurdick, Moor and Eckhouse discuss why it is important to understand pecuniary \nanalysis. old-timer among these reasons is the idea that fiscal analysis is the \nmost direct way to point out that a company may be experiencing difficulty. \nFinancial analysis can be used to establish that there is a problem, though it \nmay not always es tablish what the stock cause of the problem is. Despite the fact \nthat the authors consider fiscal analysis to be key in understanding \ncompanies, they are also careful to point out the limitations of this type of \nanalysis. For example, there can be a intention to use fiscal analysis to \nfocus on the agone, quite a than anticipating what the historical figures may \n point about the future. There is also an inherent endangerment in expecting past \n causes to veraciously annunciate future thins. \n scientific changes, changes in consumer demand and other \nenvironmental factors that are outside(a) the realm of fiscal analysis can be \n overlook if there is too much strain on historical fiscal performance. \n elevated technology companies or those in apace expanding industries may have \nfiscal figures that are too rough to provide an precise cypher of how the \ncompany is demonstrablely performing. There is also the hypothesis that figures may \nnot (whether inte ntionally or not), accurately ring the true position of the \ncompany. Finally, the authors suggest that pecuniary analysis is an art that is \nmastered by all too few people for it to be considered the ultimate analysis \ntool. \nHaving presented this sort of lengthy discussion of the limitations of \n pecuniary analysis, the authors then(prenominal) counter with an evenly lengthy discussion \nof the advantages of using fiscal analysis. Foremost among these is the idea \nthat kinks do exist and financial analysis is one of the most effective systems \nfor maculation them. Financial analysis can also spotlight symptoms of problems \n(although not the underlying cause, necessarily). Companies desire \noutside roof to infuse into the business find that potence investors \nconsider financial analysis key to their decision-making process; internal \nmanagers would do well to keep a financial picture of the company in mind to \n embarrass unpleasant surprises. Since financial analysis is quantitative, it can \nhelp point up where problems exist, quite a than where managers may think they \nexist. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the authors suggest that deliberateness \ndifferent, exclusive courses of action quantitatively provides additional tools \nto managers to make strategic decisions. \nThe authors then provide information on how readers can get down financial \ninformation. General sources, such as Moodys and Standard & Poors are \ndiscussed as are ratio reports. Ratios are of particular sizeableness to the \nauthors; they devote four pages of a chart to figuring ratios and a lengthy \ndiscussion of their proper use. Murdick, Moor and Eckhouse favor analyse \nperformance crosswise departments within a single organization, and crossways \ncompanies within a single industry in order to arrive at the most accurate \ncomparison. They note that when performing industry comparisons, it is \nimportant to compare like industries, and like comp anies within the industries. \nSelecting the wrong kinsperson can kip down the value of the ratio comparison null. \nAt this point, the authors shift their focus from finance to accounting, \nand discuss how accounting can help decision-makers. Murdick, Moor and Eckhouse \nsuggest that financial accounting should decide five basic questions. One, how \nis the company doing general? Two, when evaluating alternate plans, which is \nmost attractive? Three, what is liberation wrong? Where? How can it be meliorate? \nFour, how can activities be coordinated? Five, is the company operating as \neffectively as it can in its environment (144-145)? Anticipating that readers \nare curious as to how to begin their analysis, the authors suggest that they \nbegin by taking financial information from the most recent ten years. Any \ntrends that exist over this period are likely to rest, according to the \nauthors, because trends generally do persist barring unforeseen circumstances. \nThe authors suggest that the reader consider four questions when examining the \nprofit and loss statement. One, what is the sales trend? Two, what is the \ntrend of personify of goods sold as a fortune of sales? Three, whats the trend \nof operating expenses as a character of sales? Four, what is the trend in \nprofits? If the trend in sales is up, but the trend in profits is down, the \ncompany is very likely already in serious distract (147). Returning short to \nratio analysis at this point, the authors identify four key areas to examine: \nprofitability, liquidity, supplement and turnover. They also accentuate the \nimportance of considering any other pertinent questions that must be considered \nfor the specific company and industry. \nMurdick, Moor and Eckhouse consider break-even analysis to be important \nwhen: deciding whether to increase sales or ad expenses to increase \n account book; weighing the relative merits of decreasing prices to increase volume; \n ascertain the advisability of borrowing for capital improvements to increase \n ability; and when evaluating office automation. The first step in break-even \nanalysis, according to Murdick, Moor and Eckhouse, is dividing costs into heady \n(constant) and variable. Murdick, Moor and Eckhouse give several examples of \n blood valuation and the effect that ever-changing valuation methods may have when \nconsidering a companys financial position. This discussion reminds the reader \nthat the valuation method or changing valuation may result in a company \noverstating or understating its unfeigned position. The reader is then introduced \nto the funds emanate concept that establishes how many funds are needed for \nprojects and the possible sources of those funds. The authors then discuss \nbudgets, which they consider to be of prime importance when evaluating a \ncompanys managerial performance.. Budgets assist in planning, but also indicate \nhow the firm has performed in the past. They ind icate how well the company \nexpects to do, and how well the company has predicted their past performance. \nThey can also be used to spot difficulties and problem areas in the present, as \nwell as areas that became problems in the past. \nHaving presented a wealth of information to the reader on finance and \naccounting, the authors end the chapter with a lengthy chart knowing to help \nthe reader use his or her new acquired skills. They also show that it is \nthrough retell and frequent analysis that the reader is likely to improve his \nor her financial analysis skills, and the tools presented in the three \nappendices to this chapter are designed to assist in that improvement. Chapter 8 \nis concerned with the functional area of production. The authors begin this \nchapter by stating that the concepts they are putt forth with project to \nproduction take to equally to businesses that call down tangible goods as well as \nthat provide service. Production, they suggest, is the process of converting \nany design of product or service into the actual product or service, (177). If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Custom Paper Writing Service - Support ? 24/7 Online 1-855-422-5409. Order Custom Paper for the opportunity of assignment professional assistance right from the serene environment of your home. Affordable. 100% Original.'