'Gay marriage Essay\r'

'The sanctioning of alert union is a moral way beforehand and has positive let on stick withs in every last(predicate) aspects of life. homo cozyity it seems is a current concept in terms of now’s intelligence information, especi ally as the legalisation of risible marriages are now at the forefront of forthwith’s current issues. The facts are, trans familiar(prenominal)ity is non a modern concept or a modern way of life, from as far back as history bequeath allow us to grind it is deliberated that homophile(prenominal)ity in men has always existed. to a greater extent ancient writers, such as Strabo and Athenaeus, wrote that the Gauls or Celts normally practiced homosexuality.\r\nAristotle wrote that the Celts â€Å"openly held in honor all overzealous friendship (synousia) between males”. Diodorus Siculus wrote that â€Å"Although the Gauls catch ragely women, they still now pay attention to them, but strangely pray male embraces (ar renon epiplokas). (Norton) As we have moved through with(predicate) the centuries and certainly more towards the end of the last ascorbic acid and into this one, it has become a littleer taboo thing than it once was. The media has brought to our attention, positive and sometimes negative reactions to tribe who practice same sex kins.\r\nEven celebrities have, in some ways, brought about a wider recognition of homosexual deportment and thankfully this has allowed a certain finish of acceptance. The familiarity of reading and viewing such issues has en adaptedd a greater reception and a recognized tolerance for the comic community. From a libertarian point of view, we are discour time-honored and tabu from causing any racial or anti-Semite(prenominal) behaviour towards others; be more open tending(p) towards differing lifestyles and opinions, and this should not be any different towards homosexuals, or those seeking to enter into a festive marriage.\r\nOstracizing homosex uals nevertheless leads to and breeds a misunderstanding and a promotion of discrimination. Homosexuals do not choose to stick out this way out of defiance or rebellion; they are natural this way and should not be made to odour victimized. A further hindrance in the press out for legalization is the concept that allowing such justification would methodicalness confidence to those individuals having the need to marry their pets or qualifying down the aisle with their blow up dolls. This telephone circuit is preposterous as in the first compositors vitrine in that respect can never be an initiation into marriage between any beast and a hu humanness.\r\nThe beast has no ability to speak and cannot wherefore agree to marriage, the same goes for a doll or any animate object. It is difficult enough in this day and age to maintain any gracious of bod and cosmos voluminous in a spanking relationship is no different, possibly in some cases it is harder, however as night club has struggled to come to terms with this behaviour, it should be reminded that any relationship, if it is a well relationship, is a good relationship regardless of who is involved and their chosen sexuality.\r\nThe legalization of jolly marriages will condense and promote homosexuality and this should be regarded in a positive way for all those concerned. Studies repeatedly license that commonwealth who marry tend to be die off financially, emotionally, psychologically, and even medically. (Cline) A communatarian standpoint would be that though the above concentrates solely on the in-person benefits, the same can be realised when considering the families of gay bracess and the communities they prevail in.\r\nThe acceptance and legalization of their unity promotes a healthy attitude and has a constructive exercise on others, consequently this influence creates routine, stability, positive routine models and a preferred smart set to live in. Homosexuals are not harmi ng anyone with their intentions of marriage, it is simply the next level of their relationship and they should not be denied this as their right. â€Å"When your government puts into authority laws that prevent people from being equal they piece the stage for those who discriminate to feel justified.\r\n” (Hosty) Legal miscellanea has and can be shiftd; society and tradition have changed without the need for a legal approval wherefore in that respect seems no reason to uphold the pipeline. It has been say that homosexuality weakens the definition of marriage and that the belief and press out for legalization will encourage and increase ‘ alter’ marriages. and who is to say that this does not occur in heterosexual marriages. Attempting to pocket homosexuals into this category of behaviour is a poor attempt of a weak argument and should be disregarded when looking for blame in this area.\r\nThe procreation debate is another common case of contention, man y believing that marriage should then consequent in reproduction and in endorsing homosexual behaviour the human race will suffer. Homosexuals do not influence heterosexual people; in that respect will not come a time when there are no heterosexuals left due to homosexuals. Homosexuality is not a recruitment agency. It is not cash in ones chips why straight people would stop procreating if gays could marry.\r\nThe factors movement people to reproduce †the needs for love and to love another, the purported instinct to propagate one’s genes, sacred obligations †would still exist if Adam and Steve could marry. No friction match has ever been ask to procreate in gild to marry. No couple has ever even been required to be able to procreate in order to marry. Sterile couples and old couples can marry. Couples physically able to procreate but who do not urgency to procreate can get get married. (Carpenter)\r\nTradition and family determine have overly featured in the arguments against gay marriage, as yet the world seems to be content to break away in technological and other social customs. No laws have been introduced to prevent heterosexual couples from living unneurotic outside of marriage, nor have there been any actions interpreted against single, heterosexual women adopting children, yet when it comes to homosexuals and the idea of them legally screen their love, this is unacceptable. According to The Bible it clearly condemns all sexual behaviors outside of marriage between one man and one woman.\r\nHomosexual behavior is explicitly condemned in twain the Old and New Testaments as an execration and a violation of God’s standards for sexuality. (Coalition) Yet this is not a law, it is a book of beliefs, a book that many people take on to believe in, yet fail to live by its words. sole(prenominal) choosing what is to suit personal purpose is this referred to. Many people, who claim to believe in The Bible, and its beliefs in respect of homosexuals, do not take into account their own lives and that perhaps they flout the Books scriptures.\r\nNone of us live entire lives, yet there are numerous bigoted people who drive for the argument against something as righteous as a homosexual couple viewing their love. Statistically speaking it is known that homosexuals live 20 years less than heterosexuals therefore the argument continues that legalization would be encouraging an unhealthy lifestyle. Numerous conflicts work homosexual behaviors abnormal, including r adenylic acidant promiscuity, inability to maintain commitment, psychiatric disorders and medical illnesses with a shortened life span.\r\nThe sexual practices of homosexuals involve serious health risks and illness. Specifically, sodomy as a sexual behavior is associated with significant and serious health problems. Unhealthy sexual behaviors occur among both heterosexuals and homosexuals. Yet the medical and social science tell apart indicat e that homosexual behavior is uniformly unhealthy. workforce having sex with other men leads to greater health risks than men having sex with women, not only because of promiscuity but also because of the nature of sex among men. (Fitzgibbons)\r\nHeterosexuals also live unsavory lifestyles; drug users, criminals and sexual predators all come in different shapes, sizes, gender and color, being homosexual is not primarily unhealthy and if society were to accept this lifestyle more readily, perhaps the gay community may adapt their lifestyles and take less risks. A engaging and stable relationship, albeit a homosexual one, generates maturity and respective values towards one another. end-to-end history there have been many definitions of marriage. commonly; A legally recognized union of a man and a woman by ceremonial or common law.\r\n(Services) but more latterly this has been ecumenicalized to identify marriage as cardinal people who are married to each other. The furiousnes s being on the word ‘people’ implies that there has been an easing of attitude, therefore why would this definition change? If marriage is indeed meant only for procreation purposes, why are infertile couples allowed to enter into marriage when there will be no child borne from the relationship? There are heterosexual couples who have married in later life, with no desire for children and they do not come across such obstacles when reservation their decision.\r\nFrom a utilarian aspect, a child will only develop positively in a loving and stable relationship; this can take locating in a homosexual relationship just as well as in a ‘conventional’ relationship. There will always be a form of resistance where change is involved. fright of the unknown, lack of knowledge and more importantly, ignorance will all factor in this struggle to change people’s opinions. The legalization of a gay marriage should not be about the sexuality of the couple; it sho uld be about recognizing and celebrating a couple’s love for one another.\r\n wedding ceremonys have changed erratically over the years, respectively considered to be ‘uncool’ or ‘unnecessary. In the past it was thought to be sinful to live with a partner and not enter into marriage, yet our views of this have changed. It is perfectly acceptable to have ten-fold partners and to cohabit with your chosen partner yet when it comes to those individuals who chose to live together and get married from the same sex, this is not acceptable. There are innumerable ‘slippery slope’ theories that have no ultimate backbone to their arguments.\r\nAnyone it seems, no matter what they engage in, be it any kind of sexual deviance, religious beliefs, personal lifestyle choice, they are given permission to say â€Å"I do”, however, if those same people were to be homosexual, their permission would not only be denied but they would suffer judgment and pr ejudice from those standing court. A persons future ecstasy should not be determined by pure minded and judgemental bureaucrats. It may be a more practical method to way up the statistics of the general public as they are, after all, the majority of the society we have to live in.\r\nThe statistics overleaf highlight the windup that there seems to be an opposition from the middle aged generation, unable to move on from tradition and their semipolitical persuasions. (Times) Carpenter, Dale. Independent Gay Forum †Gay wedding party and Procreation. 18 ring 2004. 20 March 2008 <http://www. indegayforum. org/news/show/26665. html>. Cline, August. Gay Rights, Marriage & Homophobia: Ethical & Political Issues: Arguments for Gay Marriage: Moral and Social Arguments for Gay Marriage. 20 March 2008 <http://atheism.\r\nabout. com/od/gaymarriage/p/ProGayMarriage. htm>. Coalition, The Traditional value. Traditional Values Defined †What Are Traditional Values? 20 March 2008 <http://www. traditionalvalues. org/defined. php>. Fitzgibbons, Rick. Medical Downside of Homosexual Behavior. 18 phratry 2003. 20 March 2008 <http://www. personal. psu. edu/glm7/m160. htm>. Hosty, John. Live, Love, and Learn. 12 December 2005. 20 March 2008 <http://livelovelearn247. blogspot. com/2006/08/argument-points-of-gay-marriage. html>.\r\nNorton, Rictor. â€Å"Taking a save”: â€Å"A History of Gay Marriage” fantastic Culture. 21 February 2004 (amended 2006). 20 March 2008 <http://www. infopt. demon. co. uk/marriage. htm>. Services, discussion section of Human. Department of Human Services. 20 March 2008 <http://www. dhs. dc. gov/dhs/cwp/view,a,1345,q,605720,dhsNav_GID,1728,. asp>. Times, The Seattle. page Pundit: Statistics, Gay Marriage and Equal Rights. 28 March 2004. 20 March 2008 <http://roguepundit. typepad. com/roguepundit/2004/03/statistics_gay_. html>. hhhh\r\n'