“First Party at Ken Keseys with Hells Angels” and ”The Great Gatsby” Essay

In both Allen Ginsbergs verse form archetypal Party at Ken Keseys with Hells Angels and Chapter 3 of F. Scott Fitzgeralds novel The spectacular Gatsby, in that respect argon scenes of an exclusive, extravagant, fun party. Both writers employ a serial publication of literary techniques in order to help convey their origin. The use of motion-picture figure and establishwork forcet of the setting of their parties in both works help trace a common makeup that everything is not as it seems. This is shown in Keseys poem through his stovery when establishing the setting and his characterization of the partygoers. In The swell Gatsby, the setting shows a lot of the partygoers, but the way the author characterizes Jay Gatsby, the host, powerfully reinforces the theme. Upon reading the poem and the chapter there are many par everyels between the deuce when the way the author establishes the setting is analyzed. For one, they both have guests entertain by a prime party location bette r seen as the commodious wooden house or Gatsbys mansion.Having a monstrous venue allows there to be lots of guests which is another attribute to these parties. When it becomes unmistakable in the poem that some of the partygoers dont belong, the theme is potently reinforced. It states that children sleeping softly in their bedroom bunks. From the description of the party, with all its drugs and alcohol and loud music, this is not a space for children. This could be an report for the presence of 4 police cars parked outside the painted gate. This contributes to the consentient idea that things have gone awry, and that the police had to come in to skunk with it. This occurrence reveals a dark side to scenario created in the poem, and shows that everything is not as it seems. In The Great Gatsby, as Nick watches Gatsbys parties closer, he realizes that battalion were not invitedthey went there, revealing a distinct side to this scenario.The fact that people just show up wil lingly to his parties means that there is an alternate motive involved in this hospitality to complete strangers. It implies that the haphazard people will not be turned away, creating a clash ground for many, many different kinds of people, each here for a different purpose. Upon analyzing the setting and mechanics of each party, though they differ in the types of attendees, they show that there is a lot going on behind the scenes and therefrom everything isnt as it seems. The types of attendees play a huge role in the development of the theme in each work. In Ginsbergs poem it can be inferred that it is an after party for the band Hells Angels. These performers are seen as tired souls hunched over in black leather jackets, implying they are weary and either asleep or al near there. This stays uniform as it continues to talk about a tired, skinned man sweating, saltation for hours meaning that all the partygoers are exhausted and the effect of the party is strongly shown.Anothe r take on this is that something seriously wrong had happened and the tired men and women, lying there sleeping are the cause of something sinister. This explains the fact that the police are present and that at this supposedly normal party things arent so easily decrypted. In Fitzgeralds novel the character who most strongly supports the theme is the host of the party himself. While Nick and Jordan baker are roaming the party, they pick up many stray rumors about Jay Gatsby, interview that he killed a man once or that he was a German spy during the war. All of these negative denotations to Gatsbys image lead one to believe that he is in fact a bad person, and there must be something in it for him to throw these smashed parties. Upon meeting the fellow, Nick sees him as just the opposite of that making line of work of his incredulous smile.Nick becomes entranced in wanting to know to a greater extent about Gatsby, but he still does not believe anything that he is being told. Thi s still leaves Gatsby as the mystery man, and can be utilise as an example to show that at this party, even the host whitethorn not be who he seems to be. In conclusion, through their use of wording to develop the setting and the way characters are described, Allen Ginsberg and F. Scott Fitzgerald effectively convey this theme in both of their works. Ginsberg focuses more upon the way that the scene is set up and the actions of the characters as a whole. In contrast, Fitzgerald focuses on the development of a exclusive character, the scene revolves around him and the way that the reader infers he is using the party. In different ways both works clearly exemplify a common theme that everything is not as it seems.