Saturday, February 16, 2019

The Limits of Science Essay -- Philosophy Papers

Does acquirement take hold any limits? Scientists say no. Philosophers argon divided in their response. The humanities say that science is non humanitarian, and thus not metaphysically deep. In response, scientists and some philosophers contend that science is the best knowledge we have about the domain. I argue that science is limited by its form. erudition has no object that derives from the human form. Everything that is incomparable to the dimension of the human organic structure is reducible to notions that are commensurable to that body. This phenomenologically clarifies some of the most important discoveries in contemporary science. The Special Theory of Relativity shows the dependence of space and eon on the accounting system. Quantum mechanics displays the limits of observation (Heisenberg) and logical indefiniteness by compelling the creation of a macropresentation of micro-objects and gets around logic (Feyerabend) through the rationale of additionality. Experiment al science has come out as an artificial project of human expansion, not as a reflection of the transcendent wander of the world itself. The life world successfully takes the place of the objective world of modern rationality. Does Empirical science have any limits? This question is not so interesting for the contemporary philosophy of Science. Not like the questions of reality, objectivity, rationality. I believe, that these questions could be elucidated by answering the question of limitness, or, of form of Science.Does Empirical Science have any limits? The answer of the scientists is No Science is unlimited. There are no scientifically unresolvable questions, they have sense. The answer of the philosophers is not clear, that it is close to No. It is shown not only i... ...rld.And now, at the issue of this study, occurs a question Does the pre-scientific grasping of the world through logic, space and time authentically need the reinforcement which the experimental science pr oposes?Notes(1) Gherdjikov, S. Limits of Science. Sofia, Extreme Press, 1995.(2) See Heelan, P. Space-perception and the school of thought of Science. Berkeley-Los Angeles-London, University of California Press, 1983.(3) See McTagart, J. The Nature of Existence. Northampton, J. Dickens & Co., 1968. Paragraphs 303-351.(4) Hempel, K., Oppenheim, P. Studies in the logic of Explanation. N. Y., 1970. (5) Gerdjikov, S. A Matrix Model of Scientific Explanation.-International Congress Logic and Methodology of Science. Proceedings. Moscow, 1987. Vol. 6, p. 367- 368. (6) Popper, K. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson of London. London, 1959.

No comments:

Post a Comment