Qualitative vs. Quantitative Research Essay -- Research Analysis

In this paper, the author willing delineate the characteristics between soft and quantitative interrogation, as well as their methodologies. The purpose of this paper is to give the reader a brief coup doeil behind each research attempt, by determining the strengths and weaknesses of both. The terms prejudiced and object lens will be viewed in accordance with each research prototype by considering the role of the observer and addressing how the investigator conducts his or her psychoanalysis using these approaches. The author will also describe the preferred approach given to each modality and how each model can be utilized in a study of aggression. Qualitative and Quantitative be two differentiated paradigms of research, which operate under the assumption that careful outcomes, moldiness be proven valid and reliable. However, the distinguishing element between each paradigm resolves to the role of the police detective. Although they can be explicated by the source of the data collected, qualitative being a semantic text and quantitative being in numerical form, in the qualitative paradigm, the role of the researcher is to be an restless participant within the study, lending the subjectivity of interpretation to the final measured outcome (Denzien & Lincoln, 2000). However, the quantitative approach finds the role of the researcher as an outside, objective observer, where the possibility for researcher bias is reduced, and the final measured outcome is non subject to researcher interpretations (Patton, 1996). Qualitative ResearchQualitative research is a multi-dimensional method that utilizes an imperative and naturalistic approach. This design is associated with a phenomenological paradigm and is apply by observing human behavior in... ...ht eliminate the need for research participation by sending out surveys in the mail randomly. The qualitative methodology might use an example a focus group. Where the researcher is an active partic ipant in asking open-ended questions, specifically to operate the participants and prompt interpretive answers reflective of emotionality. When considering the manipulation of variables to alter conditions that are evident and measurable, quantitative analysis could include the manipulation of environmental factors, such as room temperature, lighting, etc, where the researcher is an outside, unattached observer. The qualitative paradigm would insist that the researcher be a participant of the factors of manipulation by using interruptive techniques, oral commands, etc, and determine the measurable effects on the outcome through personalized interpretation of data.