Psychodynamic Theories: Social Behaviour

Psychodynamic Theories Social BehaviourThis essay uses the bionomic and the psychodynamic theories to explain companionable behavior, counter the kayoedcomes and develop the hypothesis thus making an initial perspicacity on the Banks family. The essay pass on discuss the advant terms and disadvantages of each of the theories, the similarities and the differences between twain of them and it entrust conclude that human life and behaviour is such(prenominal)(prenominal) a solid illustration that a single possibility cannot satisfactorily account for completely events across the life span. However, it leave al unmatched assert that in want to the Banks family, the ecological model has an advantage everywhere the psychodynamic theory because it holistically encompasses number of issues such as financial security, material benefits, house, and p arnts recital among others which do excite effects on the risk of peasant abuse.The issues identified in the Banks family in clude grievances bullying, identity operator issues, and hatfuls negative early life transactions and his blood with Mark.To address these issues, the neighborly arrive at result use the ecological theory. The reason for choosing the ecological theory is because it is compatible with the perspicacity framework (2000)(DOH 2000a) as it liaisons family history, genes, p arnts and their off springs apprisalship, sparing factors, parental relationship experiences, individuals ability to cope or manage the dialect and the interactive effect of risks (Ciccheti and Valentino 2006). Therefore, basing on the ecological perspective, the well-disposed work volition take in to work within mark ecology (Bilson Ross 1999 p.70-71) to find out the difficulties that the family baron be facing and to in any case find possible solvent (Ward 1995). The well-disposed proletarian get out explore the three ecological dimensions which are attach developmental needs, Mel and Kens pare nting capacity and family environmental factors (D.O.H 2000a).The brotherly proletarians will jump an honest and open partnership with the family with an aim of safeguarding and promoting the welfare of Mark and his siblings. This will be for the parents to note confident thus engaging in the assessment by providing relevant discipline about Mark, Mel and John, themselves. He should also movement to find out about label paternity and all communicable inheritance or temperament issues that might exist between Mark and his biological stick (Aldgate and Bradley 1999).The social work will explore the parents history by requesting them to describe who they are and the trend of their relationship with Mark. This framework will help the social proletarian to amalgamate the historical and current expressation about the family, its functioning, problems and relationships (Reder and Duncan 1999 p.98-101) with the view of finding out what is happening to Mark in the context of the entire Banks family and the environmental factors and how they affect the family relationships.Other issues that will have to be computeed into are the family income, neighbourhood and Marks friendships with his peers. This is because there is a link between the familys economic disadvantage and the chances that children in the family will not succeed (Utting 1995, Jack 1997)It is also notable that Ken is securely attached to his biological children (Mel and John) and not to Mark who is his step-child. That should trigger the social proles curiosity thence exploring both the parents emotional availability, responsiveness, and their ascriptions to Mark and compare it with the way they interact with Mel and John. This can be done through fill observation, questioning and gathering testimonies from other portentous people including professionals such as the general practitioner and the teachers (Department of Health 2000a).The social l worker will also explore Kens childhood exper iences because they might be influencing or causing effect to his relationship with Mark (Sroufe et al 2005 p.10). This implies that the quality of care that Ken is providing Mark might in itself be a product of his own developmental history which is characterised by having been in care during childhood, having no father figure, thus his strained relationship with his get down (Cicchetti and Valentino 2006 p.148).It is also notable that all Marks efforts to know his biological father proved to be futile. And because of this, Mark might be experiencing identity issues such as low self- esteem, poor self-image and a poor sense of belong and acceptance by the family hence his negative behaviour (Draper Draper 1982, p.26). For this reason, the social worker should ensure that he gathers as much information about Marks biological father as possible just in strip Mark expresses wishes to see or to know about him.In regard to Marks bullying problem, the social worker would carry out dir ect work with him. In order to minimise the anti discriminatory and anti oppression practice, the social worker will have to consider his age, sex activity and culture, religion and any disability or developmental issues. He will have to acknowledge and delight in Marks wishes, feelings and his intellectual of the implications of the situation in which he finds himself thus making the assessment child centred (DOH 2000a). The social worker would also explore Marks friendships and how the interaction therein influences his negative behaviour (Rutter et al, 1998).At the end of the session, depending on what the social worker makes out of Marks behaviour and his social-emotional condition he may refer Mark for mental assessment to further establish his emotional public assistance. The outcome of the psychological assessment will then be employ during the core assessment to inform the appropriate plan of intervention to ensure Mark development, safety and wellbeing (Department of Health 2000a)Advantages of the ecological theory.The advantage of using ecological approach is that it focuses on the relationships in transactions between the systems in the ecology thus minimising the sensibility of the professionals to think exclusively in linear terms thus adapting a wide range of intervention hence exploring issues such as social actualise, social capital and socio-economic difficulties that people experience (Garbarino 1990).The ecological perspective is an combine model which acknowledges the effects of the biological, psychological social and economic factors that affect the offbeat of individuals (Payne, 1994).Disadvantages of using the ecological theory?Despite all the advantages of the ecological approach, it is a long process for families or individuals who need quick solutions for their problems (Payne 1997).The psychodynamic approach some other theory that can be used to interpret the Banks familys phenomena, predict the outcomes and formulate the hypothesis is the psychodynamic theory. The reason for choosing the psychodymic theory is that it emphasises accepting the ego which is a human race element of the mind hence providing stability and equilibrium to the service user. through with(predicate) using this approach, the social worker will be able to support Ken and Mark to develop adequate ego strength which will enable then to manage their emotional conflicts and the snags that they may come across in the life span (Goldstein 1984).It is notable that both Mark and Ken do have unresolved issues or conflicts which do have grow from their individual childhoods. For that reason, the social worker will explore Ken and Marks conscious and unconscious parts of the minds there by making any reserved painful materials therein conscious hence realising their impact on their surface behaviour (Bee and Boyd, 2006).By focussing on Mark and Kens late(prenominal) and present unconscious and conscious feelings, the social worker may to be able to predict and explain how Mark and Ken may stomach during certain situations or conditions. This is underpinned by the psychodynamic principle that all behaviour is prompt (Bee and Boyd, 2006).Due to the emotional issues already identified, the social worker may explore the how both Mark and Kens egos function and their defence mechanisms. Through respecting and working with their defences, the social worker is ought to recognise the threats that both Mark and Ken face in life and he will discuss the con periods and confusion of their feelings. The social worker would also find out how both Mark and Ken have already tried to resolve the conflicts before deciding either to look for other possible ways of dealing with it for example using sublimation or to modify the ways that they have already tried to use (Hollis, 1972).In regard to anti-discriminatory and anti-oppressive practice, it is helpful to devote the assessment within the framework or perspective of recognisi ng the implication of structural and individuals oppressive practice which leads professionals into an authoritarian and stiff discriminatory practice (Davis, ed., 200012,14 cited in Becket Maynard 2005 p.158). This implies that during assessment, professionals are ought to listen and also respect and take into consideration the service users and carers views, choices, age, culture, religion and needs as this makes them feel valued and respected (Brandon, 1990 p.59 cited in Becket Maynard, 2005 p.158).Additionally, Payne (1997 p.89) advises that in professional relationship, social work values involve being tolerant to service users behaviour, promoting healthy client-social worker relationship, rather than personal emotional responses to service users needs. This may mean that professionals are ought to create professional instead of personal relationships with the service users which might negatively affect their independence and impartiality.Advantages of the psychodynamic the oryThe advantage of the psychodynamic theory in social work is that it recognises the impact of past painful life transactional processes and helps to create adept suspicions about them in relation to the current observable behaviours (Milner OByrne 2009).The psychodynamic theory also lays emphasis on modifying the ego through initiating good client-social worker relationship (Goldstein 1984), thus improving peoples relationships within their environment (Payne 199780).The disadvantages of the psychodynamic theory.However, critics of the psychodynamic theory such as Dorfman (1998 P.70) contend that it is an andocentric theory. This implies that the psychodynamic theory is based on research that was done only if on males and then taken to mean all human behaviour which itself is a bias in favour of males and thus partial.Similarity and differences btn the psycho and eco theory.One of the similarities between the psychodynamic and the ecological theory is that both of them consider age and stage appropriateness of behaviour. While the psychodynamic theory takes into account the anal, oral and phallic stages of development, the ecological- transactional perspective views child development as a progressive sequence of age and stage -appropriate tasks in which success at each developmental level must co-ordinate and integrate with the environment and other issues such as emotion regulation, and formation of attachment relationships among others that emerge across the lifespan (Cicchetti and Valentiono 2006 p.143).Although these two theories do have the above resemblance, they also have differences. For example, go the psychodynamic theory upholds the concept of the existence of the unconscious mind or ken (Payne 1997), the ecological perspective focuses on the principle of interaction among the individuals and it also depicts individuals as existing in relation to others in the ecology (Reder and Duncan 1999 p.98-101).In relation to child abuse, Sidebotham et al (2002) argue that the psychodynamic models are deficient to give business relationship in this regard and he calls for the use of the ecological models because they include a number of issues such as financial security, material benefits, housing, and parents history among others which do have effects on the risk of child abuse.Conclusion given over the complexity of the Banks family phenomena, the quest to explain the behaviour, predict the outcomes and formulate the hypothesis requires one to use theories otherwise the assessment would be directionless and woolly. Therefore, this essay has used the psychodynamic and the ecological theory to discuss how an assessment would be done to support the Banks family. It has explored the ethical principle of anti-discriminatory and oppressive practice. It has also discussed the advantages and disadvantages of each of them before identifying the similarity and the difference between them and it has given the complicity of human life, all theories work in a complimentary way to give social workers an eclectic understanding of issues in the phenomena with one theory helping to explain certain issues to a greater extent clearly than the other. And in case of child maltreatment, the ecological models has been has had an advantage over the psychodynamic theory because it has holistically encompassed number of issues such as financial security, material benefits, housing , parents history among others which do have effects on the risk of child abuse.