Thursday, July 25, 2019
Article Response Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 5000 words
Article Response - Assignment Example The breadth of Kuhnââ¬â¢s influence on intellectual fields is captured by Matthews (2003). According to Matthews (2003) more than a million readers were impacted by Kuhnââ¬â¢s works. Moreover, many more were influenced by educators and writers who discussed or otherwise debated or discussed Kuhnââ¬â¢s work. Matthews (2003) also points out that Kuhnââ¬â¢s impact on education goes further in sparking debate among scholars and impacting research and methodology techniques because Kuhn raised a number of philosophical and methodological questions relative to the acquisition of knowledge. This paper analyses Matthewsââ¬â¢ (2003) article and draws on insight from the education philosophies of Gutek (2000) and Eisner (2001) in ascertaining the practical implications for education. This research study is therefore divided into three main parts. The first part of this study provides a summary of Matthewsââ¬â¢ position. The second part of the paper analyses Matthewââ¬â¢s p osition and its practical implications for education by reference to Gutek (2000 & 2004) and Eisnerââ¬â¢s (2001) philosophies of education. The third part of the paper will provide the authorââ¬â¢s position and its practical implications for education. ... m theory relates to Kuhnââ¬â¢s conceptualization of ââ¬Å"normal scienceâ⬠which is a research technique grounded by universal concept, theory, test and methodology (p. 23). According to Matthews (2003), when Kuhn wrote The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, created an entirely different conceptualization of science and in doing so impacted ââ¬Å"science education theory and researchâ⬠(p. 91). Matthews (2003) begins by offering some insight into Kuhn as a philosopher. Kuhn was more of a ââ¬Å"historian of scienceâ⬠and with no formal philosophical background was a self-described ââ¬Å"amateurâ⬠philosopher (p. 91). Nevertheless, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions influenced philosophical argument disproportionate to the philosophical discussion contained in the actual book. Regardless, Kuhn still managed to articulate an apparently ââ¬Å"newâ⬠and ââ¬Å"epistemological paradigm, or theory of scientific knowledgeâ⬠(Matthews, 2003, p. 92) . More specifically, Kuhnââ¬â¢s book: ...gave a modern, scientifically informed, philosophical legitimacy to much older relativist and sceptical traditions in epistemology (Matthews, 2003, p. 92). For example, ancient Protagoreans such as Plato and other realist philosophers argued that what appeared to be just was just. Influenced by Kuhnââ¬â¢s book, modern Protagoreans would argue that scientific truths and decisions were ââ¬Å"intratheoreticâ⬠and a rational conclusion can be drawn by looking more closely at conflicting theories (Matthews, 2003, p. 92). Modern Protagoreans, took a more Kuhnian position arguing that ââ¬Å"different paradigms saw different thingsâ⬠and not simply ââ¬Å"saw the same thing differentlyâ⬠: ontological claim vs epistemological claim (Matthews, 2003, p. 93). Since this pattern could be observed in science, it can be
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment