Rousseau, Hobbes, and Locke : Interpretations of Human Nature Essay

Through succession people have ever so wondered what it is that stupefys us who we are. It has been our gracious reputation that has kept us intrigued with ourselves, and our relationships with others. With this curiosity came various interpretations as to our human nature, severally changing the way we see the social world we live in. With each interpretation came a new perceptiveness of people and the relationship they hold with each other. Human nature has been wholeness of the most studied elements of the world we live in. From our nature came the interest of how we as humans interact with each other, through the development of our nature or so have served and others had ruled. Three philosophers that have focused their political ideas around human nature have given a deeper meaning to their study of political sympathies through the understanding of human nature. Each one of them had a characteristic interpretation of what human nature was and how it impacted the politics of the specific friendship that they envisioned. It is hard to say that one of them holds the acts to the true essence of human nature alone one can say that each of them has given an elicit and strong piece of the puzzle that has linked human nature to politics. The three philosophers in question are Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. I entrust be referring to them by their last name for simplicity. Starting with the philosophical views of each man we will see how they differ. It will be clear that each mans idea comes from a very different post on human nature. Thomas Hobbes thoughts on human nature get along from his childhood. According to Jean Hampton who wrote, She brought twins to birth, myself and fear at the same time (282) Hobbes believed that fear... ...fear. Lockes idea that everyone is born alleviate is good for societies that have no established governments because even in his time there was a government. In biblical t imes his idea would be right on entirely the transformation of peoples ideas has lead the changes in natural freedom. No one can control where they are born so they may be born in a not so free state. Finally Rousseaus idea that man is naturally good but corrupted by institutions is somewhat flawed because everyone makes choices to do or not do so people become corrupt through the choices they make in life. Through all this no one philosopher has the right answer to human nature but when we combine their ideas we get a square way to a good solution that benefits many.Works CitedCahn, Steven M.. Political philosophical system the essential texts. 2nd ed. New York Oxford University Press, 2011. Print.